Home > Press Releases
Congressman Bartlett, Get the Facts - Vote to Override Bush’s Veto
Monday, October 8, 2007
SCHIP: Rep.
A Vote Against Children Should Not Stand
For sure, Mr. Bartlett doesn’t have a
factual explanation behind why he voted as he
did, nor does he have an explanation for why so
many of the leading members of his very own
Party broke with Mr. Bush and voted in favor of
SCHIP, House Bill 676.
“When our most vulnerable
- our young - are forced to bear the burdens of
partisan and class politics, we all lose. We’re
calling on Congressman Bartlett to reject that
posture and vote to override this veto,”
said Michael E Cryor,
Chair of the Maryland Democratic Party. “The
decision to deny health care to children is not
just wrong, it’s frightening.”
In an appeal to Rep. Bartlett to
reverse his indefensible position, Cryor said,
“Congressman Bartlett, please think very
seriously about the impact of your vote. The
facts are available, please get them so that
you fully understand why you must vote to
override Bush’s veto and get thousands of needy
children the health care they
deserve.”
In a statement issued last week Rep.
Bartlett proudly claimed he was right to vote
against the SCHIP authorization because it
would provide health care to children from a
“family making $82,000 a year.” Unfortunately,
his own proclamations document that he is
operating with wrong information. The bill caps
eligibility for a family of four at 3 times the
federal poverty level or about $60,000. It also
mandates that the lowest income children are
first in line for benefits while specifically
banning any expansion of eligibility.
“We would rather believe
that the Congressman just took George Bush’s
word for it,” says Cryor. “He didn’t examine the
facts or understand the full implications of
what it would mean for thousands of
Mr. Bartlett would not be alone if he
changed his position. Indeed, others in his own
Party have come to understand why a veto is
necessary. 18 GOP Senators and 45 GOP House
members voted in favor of SCHIP. Many of them
came under heavy fire from Congressional
Republicans because of their support for the
bipartisan measure.
Among them:
Sen. Charles Grassley,
R-Iowa, termed the criticism…of the bill
"either totally wrong or intellectually
dishonest."
Sen. Orrin Hatch, R-Utah,
said 92 percent of the children covered under
the bill live in families making less than 200
percent of federal poverty levels, or $41,300
for a family of four. [Houston
Chronicle, 10-6-2007]
Across the state of
